SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 493

BRIJESH KUMAR, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Indian Bank – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Brijesh Kumar, J.-The dispute brought before this Court by means of instant appeal relates to refusal to allow amendment of the plaint, in the suit for money decree filed by the appellant against the respondents in Delhi High Court, which later on has been transferred to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Delhi.

2. The main contesting respondent is Indian Bank and respondent No.2 - M/s Indo-Europ Foods Ltd. has been impleaded as Proforma Respondent in this appeal. The reference of respondent wherever made in this judgment is for respondent No.1 - Indian Bank and wherever the word USD has been used it stands for U.S. Dollars.

3. As a brief background, to better understand the controversy involved, it may only be indicated that a contract was entered into between Oswal Agro Mills Limited and Indo Europe Foods Limited of United Kingdom. An amount of USD 6.00 million was advanced to Oswal Agro by Indo Europe which was liable to be adjusted against bills of Oswal Agro on export of agro products by Oswal Agro to Indo Europe. Oswal Agro furnished a Bank Guarantee of Indian Bank to the extent of USD 6.00 million, in favour of Indo Europe to cover the advance made by Indo Europe. The Bank



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top