M.B.SHAH, ARUN KUMAR
State Of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
Yash Pal Garg (Dead) by LRs – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Shah, J.-The High Court of Himachal Pradesh by judgment and order dated 10-12-1990 allowed Civil Writ Petitions No. 58 of 1978 etc. filed by the respondents challenging the validity of the provisions of the H.P. Taxation (On certain Goods carried by Road) Act, 1976) No. 34 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as "the 1976 Act") and held that the said provisions were unconstitutional and invalid. The Court held thus:--
"We have seen earlier that by the impugned provision, there is a direct levy upon the carriage of goods by road and water ways. It is not the case of the respondent State that the levy was compensatory or regulatory in character. In any case, we do not find any mention in the reply filed by the State of any facts which may bring the levy in either of the two categories.
On the averments made in the petition, noticed by us earlier, which have not been effectively denied on behalf of the State, there is hardly any scope for saying that the levy does not amount to restriction within the meaning of Article 301 of the Constitution of India. The levy could only have been saved, in case the restriction brought about by it purported to be in public interest, and that too,
State of Karnataka and another v. M/s Hansa Corporation
Sharma Transport v. Government of A. P. and Others
In Re. Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal
M/s Sainik Motors, Jodhpur & Others v. The State of Rajasthan
Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. The State of Assam & others
The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. The State of Rajasthan and others
Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. & Another v. The State of Assam
International Tourist Corporation etc. v. State of Haryana and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.