SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 138

M. HIDAYATULLAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, K. SUBBA RAO, J. R. MUDHOLKAR, J. L. KAPUR, A. K. SARKAR, S. R. DASS
Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, The States Of Assam, Madras, Punjab, Maharashtra, Andhra-pradesh, W. B. , Bihar, Orissa, Gujarat And M. P. , M. A. Tulloch And Co. , Nazeeria Motor Service, Nellore, A. P. Motor Union, The Attorney-gener – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.VISHWANATHA SASTRI, B.K.B.Naidu, B.K.P.SINHA, B.SEN, D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, D.P.Singh, DINBANDHU SAHU, G.C.KASLIVAL, G.S.PATHAK, H.M.SEERVAI, H.M.SIRVAI, I.M.SHROFF, J.B.DADACHAN, K.Bhimasankaran, K.L.Hathi, K.SRINIVAS MURTHY, LAKSHMAN SARAN SINGH, LAL NARAIN SINHA, M.ADHIKARI, M.K.RAMAMURTHI, N.C.CHATTERJI, N.S.BINDRA, NAUNIT LAL, P.D.MENON, P.K.BOSH, P.L.VOHRA, R.Ganapathy Iyer, R.H.Dhebar, R.K.GARG, RAJINDAR NARAIN, RAJINDER NARAIN NATH, RAMAMURTHI, Rameshwar Nath, RAMESHWAR NATH ROY, RANADEB CHOUDHURY, S.C.AGRAWAL, S.C.BOSE, S.C.MAJUMDER, S.K.KAPOOR, S.M.Sikri, S.N.ANDLEY, T.M.SEN, V.K.T.Chari

Judgment

S. K. DAS, J.: (On behalf of himself, Kapur and Sarkar, JJ.) These are three consolidated appeals which arise from the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court dated August 9, 1957. They have been preferred to this Court on the strength of a certificate granted by the said High Court under Art. 132 of the Constitution certifying that the cases involve a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Art. 301 and other connected articles relating to trade commerce and intercourse within the territory of India, contained in Part XIII of the Constitution. These appeals were originally heard by a Bench of five Judges and on April 4, 1961 that Bench recorded an order to the effect that having regard to the importance of the constitutional issues involved and the views expressed in the decision of this Court in Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam, (1961) 1 SCR 809: the appeals should be heard by a larger Bench. The appeals were then placed before the learned Chief Justice for necessary orders, and on his orders have now come to this Bench of seven Judges for disposal. As the constitutional issues involved affect the States of the Union, noti





















































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top