M. HIDAYATULLAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, K. SUBBA RAO, J. R. MUDHOLKAR, J. L. KAPUR, A. K. SARKAR, S. R. DASS
Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, The States Of Assam, Madras, Punjab, Maharashtra, Andhra-pradesh, W. B. , Bihar, Orissa, Gujarat And M. P. , M. A. Tulloch And Co. , Nazeeria Motor Service, Nellore, A. P. Motor Union, The Attorney-gener – Respondent
Judgment
S. K. DAS, J.: (On behalf of himself, Kapur and Sarkar, JJ.) These are three consolidated appeals which arise from the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court dated August 9, 1957. They have been preferred to this Court on the strength of a certificate granted by the said High Court under Art. 132 of the Constitution certifying that the cases involve a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Art. 301 and other connected articles relating to trade commerce and intercourse within the territory of India, contained in Part XIII of the Constitution. These appeals were originally heard by a Bench of five Judges and on April 4, 1961 that Bench recorded an order to the effect that having regard to the importance of the constitutional issues involved and the views expressed in the decision of this Court in Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam, (1961) 1 SCR 809: the appeals should be heard by a larger Bench. The appeals were then placed before the learned Chief Justice for necessary orders, and on his orders have now come to this Bench of seven Judges for disposal. As the constitutional issues involved affect the States of the Union, noti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.