SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Prabodh N. Shah – Appellant
Versus
S. B. I. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dharmadhikari, J.-The appellant claims to be in occupation as tenant of premises described as Shop No. 828 in Parekh Market, Opera House, Bombay. M/s. Nikhil Diamonds [Respondent No. 4 herein] admittedly owns amongst others the said premises in the market.
2. The three Banks [respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 herein] filed Suit No. 607 of 1995 in High Court of Bombay on its Original Side for recovery of loans advanced by them to respondent No. 4 and its partners [respondents No. 5 to 11].
3. The Banks as plaintiffs in the said Suit sought appointment of Court Receiver under Order 40 Rule 1 Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code for short) for safe custody and proper management of the properties of the defendants. The Single Judge of the High Court rejected the prayer. In appeal the division bench of the Bombay High Court by its Order dated 3.11.1995, accepted the prayer of the Banks and appointed a Court Receiver on the properties which include the premises in question.
4. M/s. Nikhil Diamonds and their partners as owners of the building and the premises therein through their counsel appearing before the division bench stated that premises described as Shop No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.