DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Jagbir Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J.-Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 1076-1077/1996.
2. Questioning legality of judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Criminal Appeal No. 1721 of 1996 has been filed by the State of Haryana. The other two appeals are by the informant. An innocent child of about 4 years was the victim of unnatural death. According to the prosecution, respondents caused his homicidal death after kidnapping him. The motive for the killing was stated to be intended demand of ransom for his release. The Sessions Judge, Bhiwani found the respondent-accused Jagbir Singh to be guilty of offences punishable under Section 302 IPC. He was also convicted for offence punishable under Sections 364, 201 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC ). For the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC he was awarded death sentence and for other offences period of sentence already undergone in custody. Accused Umed Singh was convicted for offences punishable under Section 201 IPC and was directed to suffer RI for 3 years and fine. Both the accused persons preferred appeal before the High Court. The High Court by the impugned judgment found them
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Hukum Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Eradu & Ors. v. State of Hyderabad
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka
State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi & Ors.
Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P.
Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. & Ors.
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Babu Misra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.