N.CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
Aher Raja Khima – Appellant
Versus
State Of Saurashtra – Respondent
Judgement
BOSE, J. : (With him, Chandrasekhara Aiyar J.) The only question in this appeal is whether the High Court had in mind the principles we have enunciated about interference under S. 417, Criminal P. C. when it allowed the appeal filed by the State against the acquittal of the appellant.
It is, in our opinion, well settled that it is not enough for the High Court to take a different view of the evidence; there must also be substantial and compelling reasons for holding that the trial Court was wrong. Almer Singh V. State of Punjab, AIR 1953 SC 76 at pp. 77-78 (A): & if the trial Court takes a reasonable view of the facts of the case, interference under S. 417 is not justifiable unless there are really, strong reasons for reversing that view, Surajpal Singh v. State , AIR 1952 SC 52 at p. 54 (B).
2. The appellant was prosecuted under Ss. 302 and 447, I. P. C. for the murder of Aher Jetha Sida. It is not necessary at the moment to set out the facts. It is enough to say that the High Court based its conviction on a retracted confession plus certain circumstances which the learned Judges regarded as corroborative.
3. The learned Sessions Judge excluded the confession on the groun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.