SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1032

S. B. SINHA
State of Nagaland – Appellant
Versus
Toulvi Kibami – Respondent


ORDER

In the State of Nagaland, the promotion of Superintending Engineer to the post of Additional Chief Engineer in the Department of Public Health and Engineering is governed by the service rules known as Nagaland Engineering Services Rules, 1977 (Class I and II) (hereinafter referred to as "the rules"). The Respondent No. 2 in C.A.No. 2533/1998 (and appellant in C.A.No. 2536/1998 is a diploma-holder and at the relevant time was working as officiating Superintendent Engineer. On 26.3.1991, the Government of Nagaland promoted respondent No. 2 as Additional Chief Engineer. This promotion was challenged by respondent No. 1 who is a degree-holder by means of a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution on the ground that respondent No. 2 was not eligible for being promoted to the post of Additional Chief Engineer as the said post is to be filled up 100 per cent from amongst the degree-holders. This contention of respondent No. 1 was accepted by the learned Single Judge of the High Court. Consequently, the promotion of respondent No. 2 was set aside. Aggrieved, the State of Nagaland preferred a letters patent appeal which was allowed and order and judgment of the learned Single Jud








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top