SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1193

ARIJIT PASAYAT, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Shriram – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-The appellant along with seven others faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 147, 302 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the IPC ). The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 147 and 302 IPC. Other seven persons were found guilty for offences punishable under Sections 147, 302 read with 149 IPC. Accused Mangilal, Durilal, Bhagatram and Ganpat were also found guilty of offence punishable under Section 323. All were also found guilty of offence punishable under Sections 147 and 302 read with Section 149 IPC. The appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with several other custodial sentences. In appeal, one Ganpat whose name did not appear in the first information report was acquitted. All other except appellant-Shriram were convicted under Sections 304 Part II IPC and 323 read with 149 IPC and others were convicted under Section 323 read and 149 IPC but were acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. Custodial sentence of five years was imposed on the appellant-Shriram with fine of Rs. 5000/- with default stipulation. Because of pa


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top