SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 251

K.C.DAS GUPTA, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Jai Dev: Hari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
FRANK ANTHONY, GHANSHYAM, KARTAR SINGH, N.S.BINDRA, P.C.AGRAWAL, P.D.MENON

Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR , J. : The two appellants Jai Dev and Hari Singh along with four others Yudhbir Singh, Dhanpat Singh, Sajian Singh & Parbhati were charged with having committed offences under S. 148 and Ss. 302 and 326 both read with S. 149. The case against them was that on September 14. 1960, they formed themselves into an unlawful assembly in the area of Dhani Khord and that the common object of this unlawful assembly was to commit the offence of rioting while armed with deadly weapons and that in pursuance of the said common object the offence of rioting was committed. That is how the charge under Section 148 was framed. The prosecution further alleged that on the same day and at the same time and place, while the accused persons were members of an unlawful assembly, they had another common object of committing the murders of Hukma, Jai Narain, Jai Dev, Amin Lal, Mst. Sagroli and Mst. Dil Kaur and that in pursuance of the said common object the said persons were murdered. Dhanpat Singh killed Hukma, Sajjan Singh attacked Hukma. Yudhbir Singh shot at Amin Lal, Jai Dev shot at Mst. Sagroli and victim Jaidev, and Hari Singh shot at Jai Narain and Parbhati killed Mst. Dil Ka



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top