SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1215

ARIJIT PASAYAT, RUMA PAL, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Brij Behari Sahai (D) through Lrs. , etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D. Raju, J.-The above appeals, arising out of a common judgment dated 8-2-1995 of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in First Appeal Nos. 74 to 80 of 1982, involving identical questions of law and similar facts, are dealt with together.

2. The immovable properties, land and buildings in question, which are the subject-matter of acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1864 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), forming part of large extent were granted by Competent Authority on behalf of the Government of North Western Provinces of British India by a deed dated 24-12-1862 subject only to the conditions stipulated therein, which included, apart from the payment of the lump sum amount specified therein, the rent/ground rent up to 31-7-1869 the periodical payment of on and from 31st July 1869 revised annual ground rent that may be fixed by the Revenue Collector of Allahabad District, in favour of one Mr. Walter Edmond Davis, Indigo Planter of Bengal. The same was sold to and purchased from the said grantee by the Right Reverend Doctor Avastasins Hartmann of the Roman Catholic Mission Lord Bishop and Vicor Apostolic of Patna under a registered sale deed dated 7-1-1































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top