SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 625

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, K.K.MATHEW
Hamidullah – Appellant
Versus
Sheikh Abdullah – Respondent


Judgment

MATHEW, J.: This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated 30-9-1963 passed by the Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal No. 8/1957, reversing the judgment and decree of a single judge of that court in First Appeal No. 54/51 from the decree of the trial court in O. S. No. 69/12 of 1940.

2. The suit was for partition and recovery of the plaintiff s share in the plaint property. The original plaintiff, one Kundan Lal died during the pendency of litigation and he was represented by his son Kunj Behari Lal and widow Shrimati Dallo. The defendants to the action were four in number. Haji Faqir Bux, son of Haji Khuda Bux, and the two sons of Haji Faqir Bux, namely Abdul Ghafoor and Sheikh Abdullah were defendants 1 to 3. The fourth defendant was Shrimati Kallo. Haji Faquir Bux died during the pendency of the litigation. Shrimati Kallo also died during the pendency of this litigation and they are represented in the appeal by their legal representatives. The property, of which partition was sought, consists of a big ahata in mohalla Rahimganj in the city of Lucknow.

3. The property originally belonged to Begum Mumtaz Mahal wife of Nawab Ghaziuddin Hyder. She gi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top