ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.N.VARIAVA
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Goloconda Linga Swamy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J.-Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 4702-4704/2003, 513/2003, 2190/2003, 2191/2003, 2632/2003, 2633/2003, 2636/2003 and 3463/2003.
2. By the impugned judgments the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has quashed the FIR filed by Prohibition and Excise officers alleging commission of offences under Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 (in short the Act ) and the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995 (in short the Prohibition Act ). In all the cases the allegation was that the concerned accused was either transporting or storing black jaggery/molasses for the purpose of manufacturing illicit distilled liquor or was an abettor so far as the offence of manufacturing illicit liquor is concerned. On being moved by application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the "Code") by the concerned accused for quashing the FIR, the High Court accepted the plea holding that there was no material to show that the seized articles were intended to be used for manufacturing of illicit distilled liquor. Accordingly the FIR in each case was quashed.
3. In support of the appeals, learned counsel appearing for the State of Andhra Pradesh submitted that the High C
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
State of Bihar and another v. P.P. Sharma, I.A.S. and another
Rupan Deol Bajaj (Mrs.) and another v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill and another
State of Kerala and others v. O.C. Kuttan and others
Rashmi Kumar (Smt.) v. Mahesh Kumar Bhada
Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and another
State of Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa and another
The Janata Dal etc. v. H.S. Chowdhary and others
Dr. Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.