SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 776

S.B.SINHA, S.H.KAPADIA
Shahazada Bi – Appellant
Versus
Halimabi (Since Dead) By Her Lrs. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kapadia, J.-This appeal by special leave is filed by the defendants against the judgment and order of the Karnataka High Court dated 31st August 1998 passed in R.S.A.No. 76 of 1996 whereby the High Court allowed the second appeal and restored the judgment and decree of the trial Court decreeing the original suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs for declaration of title to property described more particularly in schedule A and for possession of seven rooms in possession of the defendants-appellants herein, which seven rooms form part of schedule A and more particularly described as schedule B to the plaint.

2. The short point which arises for consideration in this civil appeal is - whether the suit for possession filed by the respondents-plaintiffs stood abated in its entirety as held by the Civil Judge at Kolar Gold Fields in Regular Appeal No. 13 of 1991 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as "the lower appellate Court").

3. The facts giving rise to this civil appeal are as follows :-

Plaintiffs are the wife and children of Essanullah. They inter alia filed suit No. 417 of 1979 in the court of Additional Munsiff at Kolar Gold Fields for declaration of ti














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top