SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1177

N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA
Executive Engineer Zp Engg. Divn – Appellant
Versus
Digambara Rao Etc. Etc. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.-These appeals arise out of the judgments and orders dated 9.11.2000 and 20.11.2000 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal Nos. 2756-57 of 2000 and 2759 of 2000 respectively whereby and whereunder the appeals preferred by the Appellants herein against the orders dated 14.2.2000 and 15.2.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge of the said court in several writ petitions were dismissed.

FACTS :

2. The Respondents were originally employed on daily wages in relation to a Scheme known as Kriya Scheme aimed at providing drinking water and construction of roads for the benefit of the rural poor in the District of Gulbarga in the State of Karnataka. The employment allegedly commenced in the year 1993. The services of the Respondents were terminated in 1996. They filed writ petitions before the Karnataka High Court contending, inter alia, that as they having worked for a number of years, became entitled for regularization. It was furthermore contended that they had still been in service. The prayers made in the said writ petitions which are relevant for our purpose are as under:

"a) Issue a writ of mandamus order or direction




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top