SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 344

G.L.OZA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Pujari Bai – Appellant
Versus
Madan Gopal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

OZA, J. :— This appeal arises out of a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court delivered in Civil Regular Second Appeal No. 1871 of 1975 dated 31-12-1983.

2. This second appeal before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana was taken against the judgment of Additional District Judge, Patiala who affirming the judgment of the trial Court i.e. Sub-Judge 1st class. Rajpura, maintained the dismissal of the suit filed by the plaintiff-present appellant.

3. The suit was filed for a declaration that the appellant plaintiff is the owner in possession of agricultural lands measuring 100 Bighas 10 Biswas comprising Khasra Nos. 54-1-2-3-8/3-9-11-19/20/55/3-4-5-6-7-15,55/16, 20 situated in village Urdan. Tehsil Rajpura with the consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff and dispossession thereof in any manner.

4. The appellant Pujari Bai. it is alleged. migrated from Pakistan in 1947 after the partition of the country and she left behind in Pakistan a large area of agricultural land. In 1949 Government in order to settle such refugees adopted certain measures and gave land to the displaced persons for th
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top