N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA, H.K.SEMA, B.P.SINGH, S.N.VARIAVA
M. P. Special Police Establishment – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.N. Variava, J.-Leave granted.
2. These Appeals are against the Judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated 10th January, 2003.
3. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:
Respondents No.4 (in both these Appeals), i.e. Rajender Kumar Singh and Bisahu Ram Yadav, were Ministers in the Government of M.P. A Complaint was made to the Lokayukta against them for having released 7.5 acres of land illegally to its earlier owners even though the same had been acquired by the Indore Development Authority. After investigation the Lokayukta submitted a report holding that there were sufficient grounds for prosecuting the two Ministers under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1983 and also for the offences of criminal conspiracy punishable under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. It must be mentioned that by the time the report was given the two Ministers had already resigned.
4. Sanction was applied for from the Council of Ministers for prosecuting the two Ministers. The Council of Ministers held that there was not an iota of material available against both the Ministers from which it could be inferred that they had entered into a crimina
State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
Kirti Deshmankar v. Union of India
State of Punjab v. V.K. Khanna
J. Mohapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa
Institute of Chartered Accountants v. L.K. Ratna
Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India
Badrinath v. Government of Tamil Nadu
Election Commission of India v. Dr. Subramaniam Swamy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.