JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-The appellant (hereinafter referred to as the accused ) calls in question legality of judgment rendered by learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court holding that the question whether notice as required under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short the Act ) has been served has to be decided during trial and the complaint ought not to be dismissed at the threshold on the purported ground that there was no proper service of notice.

2. Backgrounds facts in a nutshell are as follows:

Complaint was filed by respondent No.1 alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Act. It was alleged that cheque dated 30.6.1997 bearing No. SB/A/31 839579 for an amount of Rs. 80,000/- issued by the accused in discharge of the advance amount paid by the complainant in respect of the sale consideration was dishonoured by the drawee bank on account of insufficiency of funds. The complainant received this intimation on 2.8.1997. He got issued legal notice on 9.8.1997 through his advocate to the correct address of the accused. In the complaint, it is stated that the said legal notice was returned with a