SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 663

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.C.AGRAWAL
Jagdish Singh – Appellant
Versus
Natthu Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
B.S.Nagar, GUDWILL INDIVER, LALITA KOHLI, MANOJ SVARUP

JUDGMENT

VENKATACHALIAH, J.:- Special leave is granted and the appeal taken up for final hearing and disposed of by this judgment. We have heard Shri Manoj Swarup, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Goodwill Indeevar for the respondent.

2. Appellant was defendant in a suit for specific performance. He seeks special leave to appeal to this Court from the judgment and order dated 5-4-1991 of the High Court of Allahabad in Second Appeal No. 3395 of 1978 decreeing, in reversal of the decrees of dismissal entered by the two Courts below, specific performance of an agreement for sale of land.

3. On 3-7-1973 respondent-Natthu Singh sold Plot No. 195 measuring 5 bighas and 18 biswas and Plot No. 196 measuring 9 bighas and 8 biswas of Gulistapur Village, Pargana Dadri to the appellant for a consideration of Rs. 15,000/-. On the very day, i.e., 3-7-1973, another agreement was entered into between the parties whereunder appellant agreed to reconvey the said properties to the respondent against payment of Rs. 15,000/- within two years.

On 2-6-1975, well within the period of two years stipulated for the performance of the agreement to re-sell, respondent instituted the suit for specific per
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top