SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(SC) 43

N.CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, B.K.MUKHERJEE
Prem Chand Satramdas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
H.P.SINHA, P.K.CHATTERJI, R.C.Prasad, S.C.SINHA, S.K.MISHRA, S.L.CHHABRA

Judgment

Fazl Ali, J. :- This is an appeal from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 9-9-1948, declining to call upon the Board of Revenue to state a case under S. 21 (3), Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944 (VI [6] of 1944), with reference to an assessment made under that Act.

2. The Bihar Sales Tax Act, was passed in 1944, and S. 4 of the Act, provides that "every dealer whose gross turnover during the year immediately preceding the commencement of the Act exceeded Rs. 5000 shall be liable to pay tax under the Act on sales effected after the date so notified." It is not disputed that, having regard to the definitions of dealer, goods and sale under the Act, the appellant, who has been doing contract work on a fairly extensive scale for the Central Public Works Department and the East Indian Railway, comes within the category of a dealer mentioned in S. 4. Section 7 of the Act provides that "no dealer shall, while being liable under S. 4 to pay tax under the Act, carry on business as a dealer unless he has been registered under the Act and possesses a registration certificate." In pursuance of this provision, the appellant filed an application for registration on 19-12194














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top