SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(SC) 9

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, N.CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, B.K.MUKHERJEE
Badri Narain Jha – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar Dayal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
N.C.CHATTERJI, P.B.GANGULY, P.K.CHATTERJI, S.C.MISHRA, S.P.Varma

Judgment

Mahajan J. - This appeal arises out of suit No. 9 of 1939 instituted in the Ct. of Subordinate Judge of Palamau by the applts. against the respts. for a number of declarations in respect to their title to certain lands & for an injunction restraining the respts. from proceeding with a rent suit. The suit was decreed by the Subordinate Judge but on appeal this decision was revsd. by the High Court of Judicature at Patna & the applts . suit was dismissed.

2. The salient facts of the case are as follows : Village Darha belonged to a family of Pathaks as their ancestral lakhraj. Over a hundred years ago, the Pathaks granted the entire village in mokarrari to the ancestors of the family of Singhas (defts . first & second parties) at an annual jama of Rs. 14. The mokarrari interest eventually devolved on three branches of the Singha family, each branch getting in the following proportions : Parameshwar Dayal & others, defts . first party, to the extent of six annas; Bisheshwar Dayal Singh, defts . second party, to the extent of eight anas; & Madhav Saran Singh, to the extant of two annas. Subsequently, the two anna share of Madho Saran Singh was purchased by Hiranand Jha, father












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top