S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, N.CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, B.K.MUKHERJEE, M.PATANJALI SASTRI
V. Ramaswami Aiyengar – Appellant
Versus
T. N. V. Kailasa Thevar – Respondent
J19udgment
B. K. Mukherjea J.- This appeal is on behalf of the decree- holders in a mtge, suit & it is directed against a judgment & order of a D. B. of the Madras H. C. dated 5-1-1948, by which the learned Judges reversed, on appeal, an order of the Dist. J., East Tanjore, made in a proceeding under S. 47 & O. 21, R. 2, Civil P. C.
2. The material facts are not in controversy & may be briefly stated as follows. The applts. before us are the representatives of three original plts. who, as mtgees., instituted a suit (being O. S. NO. 30 of 1934) in the Ct. of the Dist. J. of East Tanjore, for enforcement, of a mtge., against the present resp. who was deft. 1 in the suit, & six other persons. The mtge. bond, upon which the suit was brought, was executed by deft. 1 for himself & his minor undivided brother, the deft. 2 & also as authorised agent on behalf of defts. 3 to 7 who were interested in a joint family business. The suit was contested by all the defts. except deft. 1. against whom it proceeded ex parte, & there was a preliminary decree passed on 15-5-1937, by which a sum of Rs. 1,08,098 was directed to be paid by deft. 1 & defts. 3 to 7, in default of which the pltfs. were decla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.