SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(SC) 15

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, M.C.MAHAJAN, B.K.MUKHERJEE, N.CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR
D. Stephens – Appellant
Versus
Nosibolla – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, I.M.SHROFF, P.K.BOSH, P.K.CHATTERJI, S.N.MUKHERJEE, S.P.SINHA

Judgment

Chandrasekhara Aiyar J. - This appeal comes up before us on special leave granted by His Majesty s Order in Council & it is directed against orders made by Sen J. of the H. C. of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal, directing a retrial of the applt. D. Stephens, who had been acquitted by the Chief Presidency Mag. of contravening the provisions of S. 26, Merchant Shipping Act.

2. The facts that gave rise to this prosecution are correctly set out in the following two paras. which are quoted from the judgment of the learned Chief Presidency Mag. : "The owners of the ships have an organisation known as the Calcutta Liners Conference. The seamen have an organisation known as the Joint Supply Office. Since 1940-41 the licensed Broker system for engagement of seamen had been abolished. The Calcutta Maritime Board was established as a result of a collective agreement between the owners of the ships & seamen s representatives for recruiting seamen. It is a joint negotiating machinery between the owners & the seamen for direct engagement of seamen by the owners. The Joint Supply Office does not supply the seamen. The Calcutta Maritime Board also does not supply nor engage seamen.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top