SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 70

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
19th April 1954.
S.R. DAS, BHAGWATI AND JAGANNADHA DAS, JJ.
Commr., of Income-tax , Bombay, South Bombay, Appellant
Versus
Kirloskar Bros. Ltd., Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1953.
Advocates appeared
C. K. Daphtary Solicitor-General for India, (Mr. Porus A. Mehta, Advocate, with him), instructed by Mr. R. H. Dhebar, Agent for Mr. G. H. Rajadhyaksha, Agent, for Appellant; Messrs, R. J. Kolah, Y. D. Pandit and Rajinder Narain, Advocates, for Respondent. The Judgement of the Court was delivered by

Advocates:
C.K.DAFTARY, G.H.RAJADHYAKSHA, PARAS A.MEHTA, R.H.Dhebar, R.J.KOLAG, RAJENDER NARAIN, Y.D.PANDIT

Headnote:Section 4-Payment by cheque for supply of goods manufactured in Indian State to Government of India.

       The facts found in this case were similar to those found in Commr. of Income-tax, Bombay v. Ogale Glass Works Ltd., (A.I.R. 1954 S.C. 429), except in the following particulars :

       (1) that all cheques were made non-negotiable; (2) that no credit was given by the Bank to the assessee before collection; (3) that there was: no finding that the assessee gave credit to the Government for the amount for the cheque immediately on receipt thereof.

       Held1: On the facts of the case, income, profits and gains in respect of sales made to Government of India were received in British India within the meaning of S. 4 (1) (a) of the Act.

Judgment

S. R. DAS, J. : The question referred by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal for the opinion of the Bombay High Court was as follows :

"Whether on the facts of the case, income, profits and gains in respect of sales made to Government of India was received in British India within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Act?"

The High Court answered the question in the negative for reasons set out in its judgment covering this case as well as case out of which Appeal No. 19 of 1953 came to be filed before us.

2. The facts, found in this case, are similar to those found in --- Commr. of Income-Tax Bombay v. Ogale Glass Works Ltd. , AIR 1954 SC 429 (A), except in the following particulars:

1. that all cheques were made non-negotiable,

2. that no credit was given by the Bank to the assessee before collection,

3. that there was no finding that the assessee gave credit to the Government for the amount for the cheque immediately on receipt thereof.

Learned counsel on either side did not suggest that the differences noted above, would make any difference in the answer to the referred question which is the same as in the other appeal. That being the position, this case is governed by the Judgement which has just been pronounced by us in the other appeal. We accordingly allow the appeal and answer the referred question in the affirmative. For reasons similar to those referred to in our Judgement in that appeal each party must bear and pay his or its own costs both in this Court and in the High Court.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1954 SC 504

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top