SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 100

B.JAGANNATHA DAS, GHULAM HASAN, S.R.DASS
Vashist Narain Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Dev Chandra – Respondent


Advocates:
C.K.DAFTARY, C.P.LAL, G.G.MATHUR, NAUNIT LAL

Judgment

GHULAM HASAN, J. : This appeal preferred under Article 136 of the Constitution against the order dated; May 4, 1951, of the Election Tribunal, Allahabad, setting aside the election of Sri Vashist Narain Sharma, to the U. P. Legislative Assembly raises two questions for consideration. The first question is whether the nomination of one of the rival candidates, Dudh Nath was improperly accepted by the Returning Officer and the second, whether the result of the election was thereby materially affected.

2. Eight candidates filed nominations to the U. P. State Legislative Assembly from Ghazipur (South East) Constituency No. 345, three withdrew their candidature and the contest was confined to the remaining five. The votes secured by these candidates were as follows :

1. Vashist Narain Sharma .. 12868

2. Vireshwar Nath Rai .. 10996

3. Mahadeo .. 3950

4. Dudhnath .. 1983

5. Gulab Chand .. 1768

They were arrayed in the election petition as respondents 1 to 5 respectively. The first respondent having secured the highest number of votes was declared duly elected. Three electors filed a petition under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act (Act 43 of 1951) praying that the s















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top