SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 107

T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE, B.K.MUKHERJEE
Satya Dev Bushahri – Appellant
Versus
Padam Dev – Respondent


Advocates:
Hardayal Hardy, NAUNIT LAL, R.C.Prasad, S.K.KAPOOR, Veda Vyasa

Judgment

VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J. : This is an appeal against the order of the Election Tribunal, Himachal Pradesh, dismissing Election Petition No. 14 of 1952. On 12-10-1951, five candidates (respondents 1 to 5 herein) were duly nominated for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Himachal Pradesh for the Rohru Constituency in Mahasu District. The polling took place on 23-11-1951, and on 30-11-1951 the first respondent was declared elected, he having secured the largest number of votes. The result was published in the official Gazette on 20-12-1951.

On 14-2-1951 one of the unsuccessful candidates, Gyan Singh (fifth respondent herein) filed Election petition No. 14 of 1952 challenging the validity of the election of the first respondent. On 4-8-1952 he applied to withdraw from the petition, and that was permitted by an order of the Tribunal dated 20-9-1952. The appellant, who is one of the electors in the Rohru Constituency, then applied to be brought on record as the petitioner, and that was ordered on 21-11-1952. The petition was then heard on the merits.

2. Though a number of charges were pressed at the trial, only two of them are material for the purpose of the present











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top