SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 55

VIVIAN BOSE, B.K.MUKHERJEE, GHULAM HASAN, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Gobardhan Das – Appellant
Versus
Lachhmi Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
NAUNIT LAL, R.C.Prasad, S.C.ISAACS

Judgment

GHULAM HASAN, J.: This appeal arises out of arbitration proceedings and is filed against the Judgment and order dated November 8, 1949, of a Division Bench (Reuben and Sinha JJ.) of the High Court at Patna affirming the decision of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Motihari in the District of Champaran. The appeal has been filed on a certificate under Article 133(1) of the Constitution and arises in the following circumstances.

2. The appellant entered into a partnership business with respondents 1 and 2 to carry on grain business. The appellant, who furnished the entire capital, was to have eight annas share in the profits, while respondents 1 and 2 were to get four annas each on the ground of contributing labour and skill. There was a dispute between the partners, the appellant alleging misappropriation of funds against respondents 1 and 2 to the tune of Rs. 35,000. By an agreement dated September 29, 1945, the dispute was referred to the arbitration of respondents 3 to 5, one of whom died during the pendency of the application for leave in the Patna High Court.

3. The arbitrators made the award on Januarys 29, 1946, whereby they awarded Rs. 3,500 to the appellant against r















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top