SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 3

N.H.BHAGWATI, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B.JAGANNATHA DAS
Mahadeo Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
AJIT DUTTA, ARUN DUTTA, C.N.LAIK, I.M.SHROFF, P.K.GHOSH, S.C.BANERJEE, S.S.MUKHERJEE

Judgment

BHAGWATI, J. : This is an appeal by special leave from a decision of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta upholding the conviction of the Appellant under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and the sentence of one year s rigorous imprisonment passed upon him by the Additional Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta.

2. The Appellant agreed to purchase from the complainant Dulichand Kheria 25 ingots of tin on the 5th May 1951. The complainant had in his stock 14 ingots only and purchased 11 ingots from the firm of M. Golam Ali Abdul Hossain. These 25 ingots were to be delivered by the complainant at the guddi of the Appellant and it was agreed that the price which was fixed at the rate of Rs. 778 per cwt. and amounted to Rs. 17,324/12/6 was to be paid by the Appellant against delivery. The Jamadar of the complainant went to the Guddi of the Appellant. The Appellant took delivery of the ingots but kept the Jamadar awaiting and did not pay the price to him. The Jamadar waited for a long time. The Appellant went out and did not return to the Guddi and the Jamadar ultimately returned to the complainant and reported that no payment was made though the ingots were taken delivery of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top