T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S.R.DASS, N.H.BHAGWATI, B.P.SINHA, B.JAGANNATHA DAS
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Kumar Amar Singh – Respondent
Judgement
JAGANNADHADAS J.: These are two connected appeals arising out of a common judgment of the High Court of Patna on two applications to it dated. 5-7-1950 and 28-7-1950, under Art 226 of the Constitution. The State of Bihar is the appellant in both the appeals. The first three respondents in Appeal No. 97 are the sons of the fourth respondent therein, viz. Kumar Rani Sayeeda Khatoon (hereinafter referred to as Kumar Rani). The said Kumar Rani is also the first respondent in Appeal No., 98. The other respondents in both the appeals are Government Officers under the appellant, the State of Bihar. The applications before the High Court arose with reference to action taken against (1) the property, and (2) the person, of Kumar Rani by the Officers of the Government of Bihar, under the following circumstances.
2. Kumar Rani was admittedly born in the territory of India and claims to be the lawfully wedded wife of captain Maharaj Kumar Gopal Saran Narayan Singh of Gaya by virtue of an alleged marriage between them in 1920 according to Arya Samaj rites and subsequently according to Muslim rites. She owned and possessed considerable properties. In 1946 she created a wakf of her proper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.