S.R.DASS, VIVIAN BOSE, B.K.MUKHERJEE
Shreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent
Judgement
BOSE J. : These two appeals arise out of the same trial. The two appellants, Shreekantiah (accused 1 in the trial Court and the appellant in Appeal No. 89 of 1954) and Parasuram (accused 2 and the appellant in Appeal No. 90 of 1954) were tried with a third accused Dawson on a number of different charges centring round S. 409, Indian Penal Code: criminal breach of trust by a public servant. The trial was by jury and all three were found guilty of an offence under S. 409 read with S. 34. They were convicted and sentenced as under:
Accused No. 1. Shreekantiah to one year and a fine of Rs. 500 with four months in default;
Accused No. 2. Parasuram to two years and a fine of Rs. 500 with six months in default; and
Accused No. 3. Dawson to six months and a fine of Rs. 200 with two months in default.
2. The appeal of accused 2 to the High Court was dismissed summarily on 25-8-1953 with the one word "dismissed". Accused 1 and 3 appealed separately. Their appeal was heard by another Bench and was admitted, and a reasoned judgment followed on 23-11-l953. This, to say the least, was, in the circumstances of this case, anomalous. The appeals arise out of the same trial and are from one ju
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.