SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(SC) 14

N.H.BHAGWATI, S.R.DASS, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Ram Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.P.LAL, G.G.CHATTERJI, K.B.ASTHANA, S.S.SHUKLA

Judgement

BHAGWATI, J.: The appellant along with 5 other persons was charged under S. 368, Penal Code, for kidnapping or abducting one Chameli, a minor daughter of a railway employee one Net Ram, in order that she may be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse. The other accused were also charged with having committed offences under various other sections of the Penal Code but which are not necessary to mention for purposes of this appeal. The accused Prahlad Singh and Dhani Ram were acquitted, the accused Baburam was convicted under S. 366 and 368 and the accused Gokaran was convicted under S. 368 Penal Code. The accused Niranjan was also convicted under S. 366 and 368 and the Appellant was convicted under S. 366 Penal Code and was sentenced to 3 years rigorous imprisonment.

On an appeal being taken to the High Court of judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) the accused Babu Ram and Gokaran were given the benefit of doubt and their convictions and sentences were set aside. The appeals of Niranjan and the Appellant were dismissed and their convictions and sentences were confirmed. The accused Niranjan did not apply for leave to appeal to this court but the Appellant did and she wa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top