SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(SC) 59

B.P.SINHA, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
Chattanatha Karayalar – Appellant
Versus
Ramachandra Iyer – Respondent


Advocates:
H.J.Umrigar, RAJENDER NARAIN, S.MOHAN KUMARA MANGALAM, T.R.BALAKRISHNA AIYAR

Judgment

VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J. : This is an appeal by special leave against the order of the Election Tribunal, Quilon declaring, the election of the appellant to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Travancore-Cochin from the Shencottah Constituency void on the ground that he was disqualified to stand for election under S. 7(d) read with S. 9 (2) of Act No. XLIII of 1951.

2. Under S. 7 (d), a person is disqualified for being chosen as a member of the Legislative Assembly of a State, if he is interested in any contract for the supply of goods or for the execution of any works for the Government of that State. Section 9 (2) declares that if any such contract has been entered into by or on behalf of a Hindu undivided family, every member thereof shall be subject to the disqualification mentioned in S. 7 (d); but that if the contract has been entered into by a member of an undivided family carrying on a separate business in the course of such business, other members of the family having no share or interest in that business shall not be disqualified under S. 7 (d).

3. The contract in the present case was for felling trees in a Government forest and transporting them for delivery at




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top