SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 116

B.JAGANNATHA DAS, P.N.BHAGWATI, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Kapur Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Pepsu – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.BINDRA, NAUNIT LAL, P.A.Mehta, P.G.COKHALE

Judgement

BHAGWATI J. - Special leave was granted to the appellant limited to the question of sentence only.

2. About a year before the date of the occurrence, Bachan Singh son of the deceased caused a severe injury on the leg of Pritam Singh, son of the appellant resulting in the amputation of his leg. The appellant harboured a grudge against the father and the son since that time and he was trying to take revenge on a suitable opportunity presenting itself. That opportunity came on 30-9-1952 when the Appellant encountered the deceased, and he and his companion, one Chand Singh, were responsible for the occurrence. Chand Singh held the deceased by the head and the appellant inflicted as many as 18 injuries on the arms and legs of the deceased with a gandasa.

It is significant that out of all the injuries which were thus inflicted none was inflicted on a vital part of the body. The appellant absconded and his companion was in the meantime convicted of an offence under S. 302 and a sentence of transportation for life was imposed on him which was confirmed by the High Court.The appellant was arrested thereafter and his trial resulted in his conviction under S. 302. The learned Seesions





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top