B.JAGANNATHA DAS, P.N.BHAGWATI, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Kapur Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Pepsu – Respondent
Judgement
BHAGWATI J. - Special leave was granted to the appellant limited to the question of sentence only.
2. About a year before the date of the occurrence, Bachan Singh son of the deceased caused a severe injury on the leg of Pritam Singh, son of the appellant resulting in the amputation of his leg. The appellant harboured a grudge against the father and the son since that time and he was trying to take revenge on a suitable opportunity presenting itself. That opportunity came on 30-9-1952 when the Appellant encountered the deceased, and he and his companion, one Chand Singh, were responsible for the occurrence. Chand Singh held the deceased by the head and the appellant inflicted as many as 18 injuries on the arms and legs of the deceased with a gandasa.
It is significant that out of all the injuries which were thus inflicted none was inflicted on a vital part of the body. The appellant absconded and his companion was in the meantime convicted of an offence under S. 302 and a sentence of transportation for life was imposed on him which was confirmed by the High Court.The appellant was arrested thereafter and his trial resulted in his conviction under S. 302. The learned Seesions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.