SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(SC) 78

P.GOVINDA MENON, P.N.BHAGWATI, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Hanuman Jute Mills – Appellant
Versus
Amin Das – Respondent


Advocates:
B.N.GHOSH, N.C.CHATTERJI, S.N.MUKHERJEE, SUKUMAR GHOSH

Judgement

IMAM, J. These appeals by special leave are directed against the decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta, which reversed the decision of the Third Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta. The appellant had filed applications under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking permission of the Tribunal to dismiss the respondents in both the appeals, which permission was granted. Against the orders of the Industrial Tribunal the respondents filed appeals before the Labour Appellate Tribunal.

2. The orders of the Industrial Tribunal disclose that the respondents had been warned on several occasions for their bad work and misbehaviour and with respect to some of them for even acts of violence. Thereafter the respondents absented themselves from work without leave on a particular date and for ten subsequent days, which in itself amounted to misconduct involving the penalty, if sought to be imposed, of dismissal under the Standing Orders of the appellant. The respondents explained their absence as involuntary owing to their arrest by the police and applied for leave of absence which was refused.

3. In appeal the Labour Appellate Tribunal was of the opinion that a subs











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top