SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(SC) 57

SYED JAFAR IMAM, P.GOVINDA MENON, P.N.BHAGWATI
Dharman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
D.R.Kalia, JINDRA LAL, K.L.Arora, T.M.SEN

Judgement

GOVINDA MENON, J. : This is an appeal by special leave, preferred by Dharman, son of Dhani Ram (accused No. 2), against the dismissal of his appeal by the High Court of Punjab, at Simla, thereby confirming the conviction and sentence of transportation for life passed on him by the Sessions Judge of Rohtak.

2. The facts which gave rise to the prosecution may be briefly stated as follows :-

There was a dispute regarding a vacant pieces of shamilat land in which the contending parties were, the party of the accused on one side and the party of the deceased on the other. Whereas the accused claimed that the land was in their possession, the party of the deceased put forward the claim that they had set up a line crushing machine on the land and that the land had been in their possession for many years. On the 13th of June, 1953, the party of the deceased built a Kacha wall near this machine which had the effect of shutting off the door of a pucca gher, belonging to the party of the accused. Proceedings under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code resulted on account of this action and the sub-inspector of police applied to the Magistrate that both the parties should be boun











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top