SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(SC) 8

P.N.BHAGWATI, B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR
Ramyed Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.SARAN, R.C.Prasad, S.P.Varma

Judgement

BHAGWATI J. - The appellants Nos. 2 and 3, who are the surviving appellants after the death of appellant No.1 during the pendency of this appeal were charged with having committed offences under Ss. 435 & 436, Penal Code, and were tried by the second Assistant Sessions Judge of Saran, Chapra, with the aid of a jury. The jury returned a majority verdict that both of them were guilty of the offence under those sections. The Assistant Sessions Judge disagreed with the said verdict and made Court a reference to the High Court of Judicature at Patna under S. 307, Criminal P.C. The said reference was heard by a Division Bench of that High Court. The learned Judges of the High Court overruled the contentions which were urged before them in regard to the charge to the jury being defective and further hold that the reference was, in the circumstances, not competent. They, however, without anything more accepted the majority verdict and held the appellant guilty of the offences under Ss. 435 & 436, Penal Code, and sentenced them to six months rigorous imprisonment each. The appellants obtained from this court special leave to appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution and hence this












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top