Judgement

JAGANNADHADAS J. - We have heard the matter against at some length because the review application has been made to us on the ground that the Advocate was not fully heard and was denied adequate opportunity for saying what he wanted to say. After rehearing on the points on which the Advocate thought he was not fully heard, we are not persuaded that we ought to have granted leave in this matter.

2. It is not the practice of this court to give reasons for the dismissal of an application for special leave and we do not want to depart from that practice and give our reasons here why we originally refused leave and why we still think that there are no grounds for our modifying that order.

3. This application is accordingly dismissed with costs.

4. We cannot, however, part from this matter without placing on record our very strong disapproval of the course that the Advocate - a very senior counsel of this Court - has adopted in making this application. In the review application he has referred in detail as to what, according to him happened in Court on the prior occasion and what each Judge said in the Course of the arguments. The review application sets out at length what the presi