SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(SC) 93

A.K.SARKAR, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
D. Macropollo And Company Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
D. Macropollo And Company Private LTD. , Employees Union – Respondent


Judgment

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. : This appeal by special leave arises out of an industrial dispute between the appellant,M/s. D. Macropollo and Co. (Private) Ltd., and Respondent No. 1, its workmen as represented by D. Macropollo and Co. (Private) Ltd., Employees Union. On 31-5-1957, this dispute was referred to the First Labour Court by the Government of West Bengal under Ss. 7 and 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (No. XIV of 1947). The two questions which were referred to the Labour Court were:

(1) Is the termination of services of the fourteen workmen (whose names were given in the reference) justified? and

(2) what relief were the discharged employees entitled to?

Before the Labour Court, the Employees Union urged that the discharge of the fourteen employees amounted to an act of victimisation and unfair labour practice. On the other hand, the appellant urged that the discharged employees were not workmen within the meaning of the Act and so the reference made by the Government of West Bengal was invalid. It was also contended by the appellant that the impugned discharge of the fourteen employees was not at all an unfair labour practice; it was in fact a bona fide act on the p






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top