SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(SC) 137

B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Indu Bhusan Chatterjee – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, D.N.MUKHERJI, N.C.CHATTERJI, P.K.BOSH, P.K.GHOSH

Judgment

JAFER IMAM, J. : The High Court of Calcutta certified under Art. 134(1)( c) of the Constitution that the case before us was a fit one for appeal to this Court. The ground for the granting of the certificate, as stated by the High Court, will be considered in due course.

2. The appellant was convicted under S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Central Act II of 1947), hereinafter referred to as the Act, and under S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code by a Special Judge who sentenced him under S. 161 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month. No separate sentence was passed under S. 5(2) of the Act. He unsuccessfully appealed to the High Court against his conviction and sentence.

3. The charges framed against the appellant under S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code, in sub-stance, stated that on or about 12-5-1952, he had accepted Rs. 100 as illegal gratification from V. S. Doraiswamy as a motive or reward for doing an official act and showing in the exercise of his official functions favour to Doraiswamy in seeing that a speedy and favourable settlement of the claim cases p











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top