SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(SC) 6

B.P.SINHA, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Kanta Prashad: Rizak Ram – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Administration – Respondent


Advocates:
D.R.Kalia, H.J.Umrigar, K.L.Arora, R.H.Dhebar, RAGHUNATH SINGH

Judgment

JAFER IMAM J. : The appellants, who were police constables at the time of the occurrence, were convicted by the Special Judge of Delhi under S. 120-B and S. 224/109 of the Indian Penal Code and S. 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, (2 of 1947). They were sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment under S. 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and to nine months rigorous imprisonment under each of the Ss. 120-B and 224/109 of the Indian Penal Code. The sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently. Their appeals to the Punjab High Court were dismissed and the present appeals are by special. Leave.

2. The case of the prosecution, as stated in the charge, was that the appellants had conspired at Delhi with Ram Saran Das, the approver, M. P. Khare, Nand Parkash Kapur and Murari between the 6th and 16th of November, 1955 to bring about the escape from lawful custody of M. P. Khare, an undertrial prisoner, and that they had also agreed to accept Rs. 1,000 each and other pecuniary advantages as illegal gratification for rendering the escape of M. P. Khare from lawful custody and that in pursuance of the said conspiracy they had abetted the escape











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top