SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(SC) 47

A. K. SARKAR, S. K. DAS, S. R. DASS, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
Firm Of Peare Lal Hari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Gopal Singh, N.S.BINDRA, T.M.SEN

Judgment

T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR J. This is a petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution, and the question that is raised therein for our decision is as to the validity of certain provisions of the East Punjab General Sales, Tax Act (East Punj. XLVI of 1948), hereinafter referred to as the Act, imposing a tax on the supply of materials in construction works treating it as a sale.

2. It will be convenient at this stage to refer to the relevant provisions of the Act. Section 2 (c) defines "contract" as meaning,

"Any agreement for carrying out for cash or deferred payment or other valuable consideration, -

(i) the construction, fitting out, improvement, or repair of any building, road, bridge or other immovable property; or

(ii) the installation or repair of any machinery affixed to a building or other immovable property . . . . . ."

"Dealer" is defined in S. 2 (d) as any person engaged in the business of selling or supplying goods. Section 2 (h) defines "sale" as meaning "any transfer of property in goods for cash or deferred payment or other valuable consideration, including a transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a contract . . . . . . ." "Turnover" is defined in S.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top