SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(SC) 86

B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Anant Copal Sheorey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.BINDRA, R.H.Dhebar, R.PATTANAIK

Judgment

J. L. KAPUR, J. : This is an appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court of Nagpur confirming the decision of the Special Magistrate disallowing the application of the appellant to give evidence as a witness under s. 342-A of the Criminal Procedure Code.

2. The Advocate-General of Madhya Pradesh, on 13-1-1953, filed a complaint against the appellant and three others under S. 282 of the Indian Companies Act and sections 465 and 477-A of the Indian Penal Code. The proceedings commenced in 1954 before a Magistrate but on 18-5-1955, they were transferred to a Special Magistrate who commenced the recording of evidence on 4-7-1955. On August 12, 1955, the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act (26 of 1955) received the assent of the President and came into force on 2-1-1956. In this judgment it will be referred to as the Amending Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure as the Code. On 14-1-1956, the appellant made an application to the Magistrate claiming the right to appear as a witness on his own behalf under S. 342A of the amended Code "in disproof of the charges made against him". His application was dismissed and so was his revision to the High Court of Nagpur whi

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top