SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(SC) 91

B.P.SINHA, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Badri Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.L.Iyengar, P.C.AGRAWAL, R.C.Prasad, S.P.SINHA

Judgement

B. P. SINHA, J. : This appeal by special leave is directed against the concurrent judgments and orders of the courts below, convicting the two appellants under S. 120-B read with S. 165-A, Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to rigorous imprisonment for 18 months, and to pay a fine of Rs. 200 each, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for 6 months. A separate conviction under S. 165-A has been recorded in respect of the first appellant, Badri. Under this head, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 18 months, the sentence to run concurrently with the sentence under the common charge.

2. The facts as found by the courts below, which could not be successfully challenged before us, are as follows : The second appellant, Ramji Sonar, is a gold-smith by profession, and runs a shop on the main road in the village Naogachia. In the village, there is a police station, and the shop in question is situated in between the police station building and the residential quarters of the Inspector of police, who was the First Informant in the case, resulting in the conviction and sentences of the appellants, as stated above. The first app








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top