SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(SC) 128

B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
P. M. Rathod And Company – Respondent


Advocates:
C.K.DAFTARY, D.GUTPA, K.N.RAJAGOPAL SASTRI, R.H.Dhebar, S.S.SHUKLA

Judgement

KAPUR J.: This appeal on a certificate by the High Court is brought against the judgement of the High Court of Madhya Bharat in a Reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under S. 66(I) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant is the Commissioner of Income Tax and the respondents are a firm of manufacturers of perfumery and hair oils at Ratlam in Madhya Bharat and their goods are sold throughout India. At the relevant time Madhya Bharat was a Part B State and the sole question for determination is where were the income, profits and gains received or were deemed to be received and on that would depend the rate at which the respondents would be liable to be assessed because of the concessional rates applicable to Part B States.

2. The facts lie in a short compass. The respondents, a registered firm, were assessed for the assessment year 1950-51 at the rate or rates applicable to income, profits and gains arising or accruing in Part A States. The course of their business was this: they sent out agents to various parts of India. They canvassed orders and sometimes took advance payments in full or in part and after deducting their expenses, remitted the balance to the responde






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top