SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(SC) 63

T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K.SARKAR
Moti Ram – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Respondent


Advocates:
H.N.SANYAL, N.H.Hingorani, R.Ganapathy Iyer, R.H.Dhebar, S.K.KAPOOR

Judgement

A. K. SARKAR, J. : This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Appellate Tribunal dated May 8, 1953, whereby that Tribunal confirmed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner s order of July 23, 1951 and the only question is whether the appellant is liable under S. 4 (1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act to pay tax on Rs. 1,20,000 remitted by him from Srinagar in Kashmir to British India in the relevant accounting year as his profit accumulated outside British India and brought by him into British India.

2. This appeal arises out of the proceedings for the assessment of the appellant s income for the year 1945-46. The appellant had been carrying on a business in cloth in Srinagar for a long time. In 1943-44 he started a similar business in Amritsar. It appears that in the relevant previous year, that is, between March 25, 1944 and April 12, 1945, the appellant had remitted from Srinagar to British India an aggregate sum of Rs. 5,00,850 for the purchase of goods there of which Rs. 3,00,000 were found by the Income-tax Officer, Amritsar, who was in charge of the assessment, to have been his income in Kashmir accrued prior to such year and after March 31, 1940. The Incom










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top