SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
3rd February, 1959.
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K. SARKAR AND K. SUBBA RAO JJ.
The State of M.P., Appellant
Versus
Mubarak Ali, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 141 of 1958.
Advocates appeared
M/s. G. C. Mathur and R. H. Dhebar, Advocates, for Appellant.
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1947 - S. 5A - Investigation by police officer below designated rank - Order of magistrate granting permission - Necessity of satisfying himself as to advisability of giving permission - Desirability of disclosing reasons in order - Failure to comply with statutory safeguards - Effect.
Fact of the Case:
A Sub-Inspector of Police, without obtaining the order of a Magistrate as required by S. 5A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, investigated an offence punishable under S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused objected to the validity of the investigation and the Special Judge disallowed the objection. On revision, the High Court set aside the order of the Special Judge and directed that the Deputy Superintendent of Police should carry on the investigation himself.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court was justified in holding that the investigation was illegal as the Sub-Inspector had not obtained the order of a Magistrate as required by S. 5A of the Act. The Magistrate had not satisfied himself as to the advisability of giving permission to the Sub-Inspector to investigate the case and had not disclosed any reasons in his order for giving such permission.
Issues: Whether the Magistrate had satisfied himself as to the advisability of giving permission to the Sub-Inspector to investigate the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The provisions of S. 5A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, are mandatory and not directory. A Magistrate cannot surrender his discretion to a police officer, but must exercise it having regard to the relevant material made available to him at that stage. He must also be satisfied that there is sufficient reason, owing to the exigencies of administrative convenience, to entrust a subordinate officer with the investigation.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed.
Judgment
SUBBA RAO J.: This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur directing the Special Judge, Indore, to order the Deputy Superintendent of Police to carry on the investigation afresh. The facts are simple.
2. One Shri Mohinder Nath Bhalla was the manager of Daisy Sewing Machine Co. Ltd., Bhopal. On January 11, 1955, between 12 and 1 p.m., he contacted the Sub-Inspector of Police, Special Police Establishment, Gwalior, and gave him the following information: The Company had opened their stall in the Gwalior Mela and he (Shri Bhalla) had to book empty wooden cases of machine and machine parts from Golakmandir railway station, which was near the Gwalior Mela, to New Delhi. When he went to the station to enquire for booking the said cases; the Station Master demanded annas ten for each case as illegal gratification, but he did not agree to it. Subsequently, the Assistant Station Master agreed to accept annas eight for each case and asked him to bring the wooden cases between 2 and 4 p.m. on the same day i.e., January 11, 1955. On this allegation he requested the police to take action "to stop the said sort of corruption". The police officer went along with the informant to his stall at Gwalior Mela and saw the twenty wooden cases-twelve big and eight small-ready for booking. The said Shri Bhalla gave the police officer a typed complaint signed by him and duly attested by two witnesses. With the assistance of the police officer, a trap was laid. The numbers of the rupee notes intended to be given as bribe to the Assistant Station Master were entered in a memorandum which was attested by witnesses. The said rupee notes were given to Shri Bhalla in the presence of the witnesses. Shri Bhalla was instructed to pay the amount to the Assistant Station Master when demanded by him in such a manner that the witnesses could over-hear the conversation and also see the Assistant Station Master taking the bribe. He was also told that on his giving a signal, the police would come on the scene. The plan was carried out in detail as agreed. The Assistant Station Master, after some bargaining, took the bribe, and after the act of bribery was completed, Shri Bhalla gave the prearranged signal. The Sub-Inspector then went to the Station Office and disclosed his identity to the Assistant Station Master in the presence of witnesses and asked him to produce the money taken by him as bribe. The Assistant Station Master, when questioned by the Sub-Inspector, gave him his name and also produced the notes which he had kept in his pocket. The police officer took those notes and counted them. The numbers on those notes tallied with those noted in the memorandum. He then searched the person of the Assistant Station Master and secured the articles found on him. He also searched the person of Shri Bhalla and took from his shirt two currency notes, which he did not give to the Assistant Station Master, as the bargain was struck at a smaller amount and secured the same. The numbers of those notes also tallied with the corresponding numbers noted in the memorandum. Thereafter, a memorandum of the articles recovered was prepared in the presence of the witnesses and was duly attested by them. The forwarding note, together with the record copy of the R/R prepared in respect of the booking of the twenty wooden cases to New Delhi, was taken possession of and another memorandum was prepared in regard to them. An inventory of the twenty wooden cases lying on the platform near the weighing machine at booked by the Assistant Station Master was also prepared and the same was attested by the witnesses. The Sub-Inspector, having regard to the aforesaid facts, came to the conclusion that the facts disclosed offences punishable under Ss. 120-B and 161 of the Indian Penal Code and S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, (2 of 1947), had been committed by the Assistant Station Master, Shri Mubarak Ali, and the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.