SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(SC) 44

B.P.SINHA, K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Chandrika Prasad Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Prasad Chanpuria – Respondent


Advocates:
G.C.MATHUR, P.RAM REDDY, R.MAHALINGA IYER

Judgment

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR J.: This appeal by special leave arises out of an election petition filed by respondent 1 (No. 320 of 1957) before the Election Commission, New Delhi, in which he prayed that the appellant s election to the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from Bargi constituency should be declared to be void and that it should be further declared that he had himself been duly elected from the said constituency. The polling for the election in question was taken on March 9, 1957, and the result was declared on March 12, 1957. Of the three candidates who had stood for election, the appellant secured 9,308 votes, respondent 1, 8,019 votes and the third candidate, respondent 2, 3,210 votes.

2. The petition filed by respondent 1 was entrusted to the Election Tribunal, Jabalpur, for trial. On October 12, 1957, the appellant filed before the Election Tribunal an objection under S. 90, sub-s. (3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act) alleging that respondent I had not complied with the provisions of S. 117 of the Act in regard to the making of the deposit of the security for costs and praying that his election petition should be dismissed

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top