B.P.SINHA, J.L.KAPUR, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Maharana Mills Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Porbander – Respondent
Judgment
J. L. KAPUR J.: This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissing the appellant s petition under Art. 226. The appellant before us is a private limited company carrying on the business of manufacturing and selling textiles and the respondent is the Income-tax Officer of Porbander.
2. Previous to the year 1949, in Porbander which became a part of the State of Saurashtra, there was no income-tax. In 1949 the Saurashtra Income-tax Ordinance (hereinafter termed the Ordinance) was promulgated which was applicable to the State of Saurashtra. By that Ordinance income-tax became leviable and from 1950 onwards when Saurashtra became part of the Union of India the Indian Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) became applicable by reason of the Finance Act of 1950 (Act XXV of 1950). The appellant was taxed for the accounting year 1949 i.e. the assessment year 1950-51. In that year the amount of depreciation allowed under S. 10(2)(vi) of the Act was Rs. 3,43,869. The appellant continued to be assessed to income-tax in the assessment years 1951-52, 1952-53 and 1953-54 and the present appeal relates to the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.