SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(SC) 200

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
10th November, 1959.
S.K. DAS, A.K. SARKAR AND M. HIDAYATULLAH, JJ.
Bharwad Mepa Dana and another, Appellants
Versus
The State of Bombay, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 1959. 290
Advocates appeared
Mr. Jai Gopal Sethi, Senior Advocate (M/s. R. L. Lohli and K. L. Hathi, Advocates, with him), for Appellants; Mr. H. J. Umrigar, Advocate and Mr. D. Gupta, Advocate for Mr. R. H. Dhebar, Advocate, for Respondent.

Advocates:
D.GUTPA, H.J.Umrigar, Jai Gopal Sethi, K.L.Hathi, R.H.Dhebar, R.L.Kohli

The conviction of the appellants under Ss. 149 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code was valid, as the court found that the unlawful assembly consisted of more than five persons, including the appellants and some unidentified persons, that the appellants had the necessary common intention to kill the three brothers, and that they participated in the assault in furtherance of that common intention.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common object - Conviction under Ss. 149 and 34, Indian Penal Code - Legality - Acquittal of some of the accused - Effect - Identification of all the members of the unlawful assembly not necessary - Finding that the unlawful assembly consisted of more than five persons, though the identity of all the members not established - Legality - Application of S. 149, Indian Penal Code - Validity - Application of S. 34, Indian Penal Code - Legality - Sentence - Lesser sentence - When to be imposed.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants, Mepa Danna and Vashram Dana, were convicted of murder under Ss. 302 read with Ss. 149 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case was that the appellants, along with 10 other persons, constituted an unlawful assembly with the common object of killing three brothers, Kurji, Harji, and Mitha. The appellants assaulted Kurji and Harji with axes, causing their deaths. Mitha was also assaulted and killed. The trial court convicted the appellants and five other accused persons, but acquitted seven. The High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellants and two other accused persons, but acquitted one accused person. The appellants appealed to the Supreme Court.

Finding of the Court:

The Supreme Court held that the conviction of the appellants under Ss. 149 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code was valid. The court found that the High Court was justified in finding that the unlawful assembly consisted of more than five persons, even though the identity of all the members was not established. The court also found that the appellants had the necessary common intention to kill the three brothers, and that they participated in the assault in furtherance of that common intention. Therefore, the court held that S. 149 and S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code were correctly applied.

Issues: 1. Whether the conviction of the appellants under Ss. 149 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code was valid, given that some of the accused persons were acquitted? 2. Whether the High Court was justified in finding that the unlawful assembly consisted of more than five persons, even though the identity of all the members was not established? 3. Whether the appellants had the necessary common intention to kill the three brothers and whether they participated in the assault in furtherance of that common intention?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The acquittal of some of the accused persons did not affect the validity of the conviction of the appellants, as the court found that the unlawful assembly consisted of more than five persons, including the appellants and some unidentified persons. 2. The High Court was justified in finding that the unlawful assembly consisted of more than five persons, even though the identity of all the members was not established, as the prosecution evidence showed that more than five persons were involved in the offence. 3. The appellants had the necessary common intention to kill the three brothers and participated in the assault in furtherance of that common intention, as evidenced by their participation in the assault and the fact that they were armed with axes.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed.

Judgment

S. K. Das, J.: This is an appeal by special leave. The two appellants are Mepa Danna and Vashram Dana. The learned Sessions Judge of Rajkot tried them along with ten other persons for various offences under the Indian Penal Code, including the offence of murder punishable under section 302 read with Ss. 149 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Of the twelve persons whom he tried, the learned Sessions Judge acquitted seven. He convicted five of the accused persons. The two appellants were sentenced to death, having been found guilty of the offence under section 302 read with S. 149, as also S. 302 read with S. 34, Indian Penal Code; the other three convicted persons were sentenced to imprisonment for life. No separate sentences were passed for the minor offences alleged to have been committed by them.

2. All the convicted persons preferred an appeal to the High Court of Bombay. There was also a reference by the Sessions Judge under S. 374, Code of Criminal Procedure, for confirmation of the sentence of death passed on the two appellants. The appeal and the reference were heard together and by its judgment pronounced on April 2, 1959, the High Court affirmed the conviction of four of the convicted persons, namely, the two appellants and two other convicted persons who were accused Nos. 1 and 11 in the trial court. The High Court allowed the appeal of accused No. 8 and set aside the conviction and sentence passed against him. It is worthy of note here that as a result of the judgment pronounced by the High Court, the number of convicted persons came down to four only. We are emphasising this circumstance at this stage, because one of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants with regard to their conviction for the offence punishable under S. 302 read with S. 149 centres round this fact. We had earlier stated that the number of persons whom the learned Sessions Judge tried was twelve only. However, the prosecution case which we shall presently state in a little greater detail was that there were altogether thirteen accused persons who constituted the unlawful assembly and committed the offences in question in prosecution of the common object of the assembly or in furtherance of the common intention of all. One of them, however, was a juvenile and was tried by a Juvenile Court under the Saurashtra Children Act,1956. That is why the number of accused persons before the learned Sessions Judge was twelve only. The case record before us does not disclose the result of the trial in the Juvenile Court though it has been stated on behalf of the appellants that that trial ended in an acquittal.

3. It is necessary now to state what the prosecution case against the twelve accused persons was. There is a village called Nani Kundal within police station Babra in the district of Madhya Saurashtra. In that village lived one Shavshi, who had four sons called Kurji, Harji Mitha and Virji. One Dana Bharwad, described as accused No. 1 in the trial court, also lived in the same village. He had three sons called Amra, Mepa and Vashram. We have already stated that Mepa and Vashram are the two appellants before us. In the beginning of the year 1958 Amra was murdered and Harji and Mitha were tried for that murder by the learned Sessions Judge of Rajkot. He, however, acquitted them on May 14, 1958. This caused dis-satisfaction to Dana and his two sons Mepa and Vashram. On July 14, 1958, Harji Mitha and Virji went to a place west of the village where they had a cluster of huts. This place was north of another cluster of huts belonging to Dana. When the aforesaid three brothers were engaged is some agricultural operations, they were attacked by a mob of persons led by the two appellants who were armed with axes. Harji was pounced upon and felled by blows. He managed to get up and ran towards the village. Simultaneously; Mitha and Virji also ran more or less in the same direction. The three brothers were, however, pursued. Kurji, the fourth brothe





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top