SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(SC) 71

J.C.SHAH, K.C.DAS GUPTA
Pramatha Nath Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, K.R.CHAUDHARY, P.K.BOSH, P.K.GHOSH

Judgment

DAS GUPTA, J. : The question raised in this appeal is whether a Magistrate after making an order of discharge under S. 251A (2) Cr. P. C., in respect of a charge for an offence triable as a warrant case can still proceed to try the accused for another offence disclosed by the police report and triable as a summons case. The case against the appellant was instituted on a police report which charged him with an offence under S. 332 of the I. P. C., for "voluntarily causing hurt by means of a piece of wood to the complainant, Sisir Kumar Bose, Bailiff of Calcutta Corporation and Chandra Sekhar Battacharjee, an employee of Calcutta Corporation with the intent to prevent or deter those persons from discharging their duties as public servants." The Magistrate after satisfying himself that the documents referred to in S. 173 Cr. P. C., had been furnished to the accused examined the documents and was of opinion after hearing counsel of both parties that the charge under S. 332 I. P. C., could not be sustained. He was however of opinion that there was evidence to establish a prima facie case under S. 323 I. P. C. He accordingly charged the accused under S. 323 I. P. C, examined him















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top