SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(SC) 66

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
9th March 1960.
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND K.N. WANCHOO, JJ.
Tea Districts Labour Association, Calcutta, Appellant
Versus
Ex-employees of Tea Districts Labour Association and another, Respondents.
Civil appeal No. 169 of 1959.
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. C. Setalvad, Attorney-General for India (M/s. Vidya Sagar and B. N. Ghosh, Advocates, with him) for the Appellants; M/s. M. S. K. Sastri and R. Patnaik. Advocates for Respondent No. 1. Mr. R. Patnaik Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

Advocates:
B.N.GHOSH, M.C.SETALVAD, M.S.K.Shastri, R.PATTANAIK, VIDYA SAGAR NAYYAR

A mala fide closure does not necessarily mean that the closure is unreal and nonexistent.

Headnote:

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 - S. 25-FFF - CLOSURE OF AGENCIES - BONA FIDE - MALA FIDE - LEGAL CONSEQUENCES.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Tea Districts Labour Association, closed down two of its agencies, Koraput and Berhampur, on the ground of declining business. The industrial tribunal found that the closure was not bona fide and directed the appellant to reinstate the retrenched workmen and pay all its workmen employed at the two centers as though the centers had not been closed. The appellant challenged the award.

Finding of the Court:

The Supreme Court held that the closure was in fact and the finding of mala fides did not justify the conclusion that the agencies should be deemed to continue. The award was set aside to the extent that it issued directions to the appellant on the basis that the closure, in the eyes of law, had not taken place.

Issues: Whether the closure of the agencies was bona fide.

Ratio Decidendi: A mala fide closure may be treated as falling in the same class as a pretense of closure for the purpose of S. 23 of the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950, but it does not necessarily mean that the closure is unreal and nonexistent. If the closure is in fact, the finding of mala fides only entails the liability of the employer to pay the higher compensation under S. 25-FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Final Decision: The appeal was partially allowed, and the award was set aside to the extent that it issued directions to the appellant on the basis that the closure, in the eyes of law, had not taken place.

Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. : This appeal by special leave arises from an industrial dispute between the appellant, the Tea Districts Labour Association, and the respondents the ex-employees of the appellant and another. The dispute which was referred to the industrial tribunal for its adjudication consisted of two items :-

"(a) Whether the retrenchment of ten workers of Koraput and Ganjam agencies of Tea Districts Labour Association effected on the 30th November, 1956, was justified, if not, to what relief those workers are entitled?

(b) Whether the closure of the Koraput and Ganjam agencies contemplated by Messrs. Jardine Henderson Ltd., Secretaries, Tea Districts Labour Association with effect from the 31st May, 1957, is bona fide : If so, whether the affected workers are entitled to some other alternative employment in any other establishment under the same management. If not bona fide, to what relief those workers are entitled?"

On this reference the award which was passed by the Tribunal directs the appellant to pay to the ten retrenched workmen all the pay and allowances to which they were entitled from November 30, 1956 to May 31, 1957, and it further orders the appellant to pay all its employees of the Berhampur and Koraput agencies, including the said ten retrenched workmen, all their pay and allowances from May 31, 1957, till one month after the publication of the award within which time the Management, if it so choses, may close down the agencies, and in that event there would be no necessity for further notice of retrenchment to those ten retrenched workmen . The award has further added that if no bona fide closure is effected the ten retrenched workmen would be entitled to statutory notice if the Management still wants to retrench them. In regard to the other employees the award provides that they shall be entitled to all their pay and allowances as before and the agencies will in the eye of law be continuing agencies. The validity of the latter portion of the award in particular is challenged before us by the appellant in the present appeal by special leave.

2. The appellant is a Company Limited by Guarantee of performance of service only for its members and was formed in 1917. The appellant s members are the owners of several tea gardens in West Bengal and Assam and its chief object is to recruit labour from different parts of India and to supply it to the said tea gardens according to their requirements. Jardine Henderson Ltd. have since 1953 been and still are the Secretaries of the appellant. The appellant had a number of establishments in different parts of India which were known as Local Agencies, Local Forwarding Agencies and Forwarding Agencies. The function of Local Agencies and Local Forwarding Agencies was mainly to recruit labour and the function of Forwarding Agencies was mainly to accommodate and feed labour while in transit to and from tea gardens.

3. Towards the end of the appellant s financial year 1955-56, the appellant s Secretary received estimates from the constituent members regarding their estimated requirements of labour for the seasons from 1956 to 1959, and it appeared that these estimates were between 6,000 to 10,000 adults per annum. whereas in the past the appellant s organisation catered for the recruitment of about 30,000 labourers per annum. This appreciable decline in the activities and business of the appellant raised the problem of closing some of its agencies. In or about the beginning of March, 1957, it became apparent to the appellant that the requirement of labour was rapidly falling and that it would be necessary to close some of its agencies. Thereupon, the question was considered by the appellant s general committee held on March 7, 1957, and it was decided inter alia that the two local agencies at Koraput and Berhampur (Ganjam) should be closed, if possible by April 1, 1957, It was in pursuance of this resolution that the appellant ultimately decided to close down the said tw













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top